Sponsors

Free App

Free App
30 Second Real Estate Analyzer

8.17.2010

Environment minister has serious concerns

Canadian Tire has admitted its stores have been charging consumers too much for eco fees since they came into effect on July 1. The company says it was the result of a computer glitch.

A receipt obtained by CTV Ottawa shows one Canadian Tire shopper was charged a 37-cent eco fee on a $1 jug of bleach. However, that charge should have been much less.

Examples listed in the Toronto Star on Wednesday indicate a shopper was charged a 60-cent eco fee on a $3 bottle of laundry detergent; another was charged a $3.23 eco fee on a $20 driveway sealer.

"We apologise to our customers for the inconvenience," said Canadian Tire spokesperson Amy Cole.

"Customers that return to the store with a receipt will be reimbursed the difference between the incorrect fee and the adjusted, correct fee."

Environment minister has serious concerns

In a letter to the head of Stewardship Ontario on Tuesday, Ontario's environment minister said he has "serious concerns" with overcharging of fees.

"Some retailers have been charging fees greater than the set fee Stewardship Ontario charges businesses. This is unacceptable and must be addressed immediately," said John Gerretsen.

"If the situation is not rectified, I will consider options to ensure consumers are not being misled about any fees being charged or eliminate altogether the ability to charge additional set fees to consumers."

What are the fees for?

The eco fees quietly came into effect on July 1, the same day as the Harmonized Sales Tax. The fees are applied to a long list of products, including aerosol containers, fire extinguishers, fluorescent tubes, syringes and needles, and all toxic, corrosive and flammable products.

The fees go to various stewardship councils across the province to ensure hazardous materials don't end up in landfills.

The Sierra Club of Canada says the program is important because hazardous material that isn't disposed of properly can become a health and environmental risk.

"Our water waste management systems aren't designed to capture those (hazardous materials) and process them out. (The systems) are about sanitizing, so they tend to go right through the system and end up in our drinking water, so we are drinking a watered down version of it," said John Bennett, executive director of the Sierra Club.

The first phase of eco fees were introduced on July 1, 2008. The Ontario government predicts the 13 new categories added to the program this month will help divert an estimated 26,000 tonnes of hazardous waste from the landfill in the first year alone.

Residents in Ottawa plan to protest the fee outside Premier Dalton McGuinty's office on Saturday.

With a report from CTV Ottawa's Catherine Lathem and Kate Eggins




FREE Crystal Light Pure Fitness from Vocalpoint!

FREE Crystal Light Pure Fitness from Vocalpoint!

Here is a free money saving coupon from Crystal Light.

8.16.2010

Oracle and Google at it. Faulty cell phones.

This will be interesting to watch the stock prices of these Silicon Valley giants.  Also, this could end up impacting your cell phone plans if they are to prove that the patents have been abused.  If Java becomes more of a proprietary programming language then their will slowly be an increase in more open source technologies and platforms.  That will cost lots of R&D dollars and the consumer will be dealing with faulty products for years.

 

Two Silicon Valley heavyweights are about to reenact the Java wars: this time, in a court room.

 

Oracle issued a press release late Thursday saying it has filed suit against Google for infringing on copyrights and patents related to Java, which Oracle acquired along with Sun Microsystems earlier this year. The terse release claimed Google "knowingly, directly and repeatedly infringed Oracle's Java-related intellectual property."

 

A copy of the complaint (PDF), which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, says that "Android (including without limitation the Dalvik VM and the Android software development kit) and devices that operate Android infringe one or more claims of each of United States Patents Nos. 6,125,447; 6,192,476; 5,966,702; 7,426,720; RE38,104; 6,910,205; and 6,061,520."

 

A Google representative said the company had not yet been served with the lawsuit, and therefore couldn't comment until it had a chance to review it. An Oracle representative declined to comment beyond the complaint.

 

Back when Google first announced plans to develop Android in 2007, it immediately raised the blood pressure of Java developers at Sun. Google's Java implementation is different than the one advocated by a Java standards group, which worried those tech industry veterans who remember the problems that Microsoft caused for Java by following a similar path on Windows.

 

Of course, Java has been forked and fragmented many times over the years, destroying the "write once run anywhere" promise of the technology with different implementations on different computing platforms. Still, Oracle, on behalf of Sun, is arguing that Java is a mobile operating system competitor against Android, and that Google is using Java-derived technologies without a proper license.

 

Oracle also noted the interlocking history between Google and Java in its complaint, noting that "Google has been aware of Sun's patent portfolio, including the patents at issue, since the middle of this decade, when Google hired certain former Sun Java engineers." Google CEO Eric Schmidt led the team that developed Java at Sun prior to becoming CEO of Novell, and later Google in 2001. Urs Hölzle, senior vice president of operations and a Google Fellow, also played a significant role in Java's development in the 1990s, and apparently other Sun engineers have joined Google in the intervening years.